5 July 2025

31 thoughts on “Holy Grail: Lay 0-0 at Half Time

  1. Rasmus, the numbers don’t add up to what you re saying.
    If you have 92% success rate with 12% return you’d hardly make a profit.
    Say you have a house 100 $ and you bet 10 bucks on 10 games.
    Say you win 9 out of 10 (according to your 92%) you’d have made (10+1,2)*9 $ on lost 10. Take out the initial investment and your left with a profit of 0.8 $ on a 100 $ investment. That’s hardly making a comfortable living.

    1. Rasmus probably won’t lose his stake of 10 in total. If his system works correct, the 8% losses will be limited so that the overall winning percentage can be 12%.

  2. After thinking a while on this one I think I get it:

    1st bet is Lay 0 – 0 at Half Time
    2nd bet is Over 1.5 goals in Total

    The 3rd bet is placed only if the 1st bet is lost on half time and is Lay 0 – 0 at Full Time.

    But for this to work we have to make sure the odds are “right” and the sums we play should be calculated very carefully.

  3. I dont think this going to work, one example with normal odds: Lay 0-0 half time around 3.00. over 1,5 total around 1,4.
    You can never make up for the loss with your third bet. If you can give an example it would be great, i like the idea with a second bet on over 1,5 goals but i cant make it profitable. a Comment from soccerwidow should be interesting on this idea too.

  4. You are all forgetting one thing, the team must be clear favourite, what you looking is only odds, match selection is important also, more wins should be at the half time lays, the third bet is coming in play at half time laying the score that you think it would not happen, for example: Do you think San Marino can beat Holland 2-0? I think only in science fiction, so you must lay scores that you think will not happen and making up profits on scores that you think one of them will occur, it is simple this slicer strategy, however this is not 100% strategy it never were 100% strategy this man “slicer” claims it is. BUT ITS NOT because it is not 100% strategy nothing is 100% in football so this slicers method is also not 100%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *