It is difficult to believe but, there are plenty of people around who have little idea exactly what a bet is or what is meant whenever I mention being interested in betting or the fact that I run a Web site about online football betting.

Obviously in England most people have come across betting at some stage in their lives and high street bookmakersâ€™ shops have been around in their multitudes for decades. However, most of my family lives in Germany and belongs to the innocent or ignorant section of society which has little notion.

I recently spent hours trying to explain to my Father what a bet is. Also, the fact that one can bet on various outcomes in the same football match was a new and slightly confusing concept to many of my family members.

Therefore, todayâ€™s article sets out exactly what is meant by the terms â€œ**bet**â€, â€œ**betting**â€, â€œ**odds**â€, â€œ**stake**â€, â€œ**bookmaker**â€ and â€œ**mathematical advantage**â€.

### Betting on the example of a coin toss

*Imagine tossing a coin:* there are two possible outcomes, either it will land showing the â€˜headâ€™ or the â€˜tailâ€™ facing up. The separate â€˜likelihoodâ€™ (or â€˜probabilityâ€™) of both results is exactly 50/50. In other words, after 100 throws, in theory the result should show 50 â€˜headsâ€™ and 50 â€˜tailsâ€™.

Now we will apply the concept of betting to these results: one person believes the next coin toss will be â€˜headsâ€™, whilst the other believes the outcome will be â€˜tailsâ€™ and both parties agree to wager (* bet*) money on their guesses. In betting terminology, the money risked by both parties in this transaction is called the â€˜

*â€™ and for this example the stake shall be one Euro. This means each party bets one Euro on their chosen result to win.*

**stake***The coin is tossed:* if â€˜headsâ€™ lands face-up then the party who guessed/wagered on â€˜headsâ€™ wins and vice versa if it lands â€˜tailsâ€™. The player who guessed correctly keeps his stake AND wins the stake of the other person; the opponent loses his stake (in this example one Euro).

If this game is played, say 100 times, and both parties stick religiously to their selections (i.e. each betting 100 times always on the same result), then after 100 coin tosses, according to theoretical probability, both should be neither the richer nor the poorer than at the beginning. As seen, for one player there should theoretically be 50 times â€˜headsâ€™ meaning 50 wins of one Euro, cancelled out exactly by the coin landing 50 times â€˜tailsâ€™. Of course, this situation is also parity for the other player.

However, perhaps the game doesn’t pan out according to the theoretical rules? Maybe the perception is that â€˜headsâ€™ lands face-up more often than â€˜tailsâ€™? The game now evolves and receives an â€˜edgeâ€™ if one party is no longer willing to pay out one Euro should â€˜headsâ€™ win but reaches an agreement with the other to pay say, 90 Cents instead. This means that in future if â€˜headsâ€™ wins he will now only earn 90 Cents each time but, if â€˜tailsâ€™ wins, then his opponent wins the bet and with it the whole of â€˜headsâ€™ one Euro stake.

*This change now guarantees a loss on one side and a profit to the other, over the longer term:* If one bets 100 times â€˜headsâ€™ and as expected, the coin lands 50 times â€˜headsâ€™ then 45 Euros will be won (50 x 90 Cents = 45 â‚¬); however when â€˜tailsâ€™ lands 50 times then 50 Euros will be lost (50 x 1 â‚¬ = 50 â‚¬).

**In this way, whoever puts their selves in the position of mathematical disadvantage in a gambling transaction will for sure lose money in the long run**. In our example, after 100 bets, the player of â€˜headsâ€™ will have lost five Euros. The winner of this transaction received one Euro every time the coin landed â€˜tailsâ€™ and only paid out 90 Cents when the coin landed in favour of their opponent, â€˜headsâ€™.

Hi Soccerwidow.

I read most of your articles about odds calculation and its all great stuff and just continue with good work. I will try to recommend you to as much people as I can 🙂

I have a question about mathematical advantage in this case:

let s say I found two matches whit higher odds than zero odds, first 2.4(bookie odds) / 2.25(true odds) = 6.6% advantage, second 1.65(bookie odds) / 1.5(true odds) = 10% advantage. So in this case if I play multiples I get a mathematical advantage of 17% (2,4*1,65 / 2,25*1,5) right? And if would continue to play like this I would need to adjust my stake so the winning amount is the same in every case?

Thanks.

Best regards

Hi Betman,

Regarding staking, I would always recommend the fixed win/ fixed win plan. Meaning adjusting the stake that you don’t exceed a fixed amount of risk (lay bets), or limit your winnings to a fixed amount.

However, I would advise against multiples. It is already difficult enough to predict individual matches.

hi there,

this is really useful stuff youre posting here. Im glad i have came across your site. Im looking forward to see some more advanced articles 😉

br/bester